For BCM 325 I was asked to comment on three of my peers Digital artefact pitches, but instead of 3 comments I have made five because in two of them I feel I did not provide enough feedback linking my points to the lecture topics, so I went back and left replies on two of my original comments. I doubled down because for this class I am aiming for a distinction, and in my pitch, I missed the mark. I wanted to make sure that I met the outlined points on the marking criteria as best I could this time around to make up for my previous performance. In this post, I will cover the comments I left and give a brief overview of what I said/outlined in each and ill end with what I believe I did well in and what I think I could improve on or do…