My process when giving feedback to peers started with a simple list of dot points I wanted to fill in through my initial viewing and reading for their pitch. The list consisted of:
- Name
- Project
- Future relation
- Objective
- Platform
- Timeline
These points started with simple one-word answers and as I went through was able to elaborate further as the ‘questions’ were answered. I found this as a similar way to which I have previously conducted feedback and an effective way to take notes of things I wanted to discuss in my comments.
For all three comments, I used the same process. Taking notes prior, allowing a reflection period to re-read and follow up on the notes – then conducting the comments.


For Mackenzie Smith, I discussed what his topic was and found points and areas I found really effective and easy to understand, I found his platform of choice…
View original post 402 more words