All posts by Britt Spencer

Bioethics

brittaspencer

Bioethics is the debate of the ethical issues surrounding modern biotechnologies, In an era where the rate of technological advancement is increasing more dramatically than ever, the introduction and application of new technologies – more often than not – comes hand in hand with the question just because we can do something, does it mean that we should? Bioethics helps us answer this question. I would like to explore the conversations that this question generates, investigating the ethical concerns surrounding emerging biotechnologies. Biotechnology can be defined as the manipulation of living organisms or their components’ (Merriam-Webster Dictionary), the term was coined in 1919 by Hungarian agricultural engineer Karoly Ereky to describe a technology based on converting raw materials into a more useful product, which he predicted could provide solutions to societal crises such as food and energy shortages. Biotechnologies have been met with resistance on various fronts, primarily…

View original post 1,628 more words

The Eight-Week Learning Curve that was Twitter

brittaspencer

Prior to BCM325, I didn’t have a Twitter account, so the idea of live-tweeting was entirely new to me. The first week in particular I struggled, having to create a twitter account on a phone while watching a movie on a projector, while researching the movie on a laptop trying to understand what was happening because I’d missed the beginning because of all of the above, while attempting to develop relatively informed opinions about a genre with which I’m fairly unfamiliar with, while at the same time trying to figure out which button on Twitter does what, it was all a bit overwhelming. I eventually got the hang of Twitter as we went along each week, and discovered I could draft tweets which helped with not having to miss key scenes and losing touch with what was happening in the plot. I figured out the images and the GIFs and…

View original post 529 more words

‘Consciousness and the Posthuman’

brittaspencer


In his paper 
‘Cyberculture, Cyborgs and Science-Fiction: Consciousness and the Posthuman’ (2006), William S. Haney II argues that “the first-person experience of pure consciousness may soon be under threat from posthuman biotechnology” (Haney, 2006 p.VII). Consciousness is important in distinguishing between machine and organism, as physicist Jean Burns notes, humans have volition, which is associated with consciousness, while machines do not. Posthumanism can be defined as a “human-technology symbiosis” (Haney, 2006 p.2), and while there are many benefits to the biology-machine interface, there are also many potentially negative consequences, in particular, the possibility of irreversible damage to human nature through invasive biotechnologies. Posthumanism aims to extend the human experience by artificially enhancing our mental and physical capabilities, and in doing so may undermine human nature and consciousness which would have a devastating far-reaching effect on the human species.

One work of science-fiction which deals with consciousness and…

View original post 826 more words

Bioethics in Science-Fiction

1920x1200

In an era where the rate of technological advancement is increasing more dramatically than ever, the introduction and application of new technologies – more often than not – comes hand in hand with the question just because we can do something, does it mean that we should? Through my digital artefact I would like to explore the conversations that this question generates, investigating the ethical concerns surrounding emerging biotechnologies, and how these concerns are manifesting in science fiction. Biotechnology can be defined as ‘the manipulation of living organisms or their components’(Merriam-Webster Dictionary), examples including stem cell research and agricultural genetic modification. Biotechnologies such as these have been met with resistance on various fronts, primarily due to their moral ambiguity and uncertainty regarding the potential wide-spread and long-term ramifications. Informed by the reality of progressive biotechnologies and bioethical debate, science-fiction reflects existing perspectives and possibilities, and acts as a vehicle for the exploration of the potential for biotechnology, encompassing within it both the hopes and fears of society.

Stem cell research and agricultural genetic modification are two biotechnologies which are already prevalent in society. Stem Cell Research is conducted by biologists on stem cells obtained from two main sources, Pluripotent cells and Totipotent cells. Pluripotent cells can be found in various places, such as bone marrow, the liver and the brain, while Totipotent cells are extracted from human embryos. This is where the controversy begins, as the extraction of Totipotent cells for research purposes results in the destruction of the embryo. Discernibly the most imperative question in the debate surrounding stem cell research, is when does life begin? The Catholic church has voiced strong opinions in opposition of Totipotent stem cell research, in ‘Donum Vitae’ Pope John Paul II establishes the Catholic understanding that human life begins at the moment of conception, so each embryo is entitled to the same protection as any other human being. The Catholic Church is openly supportive of SCR involving Pluripotent cells, but is strictly against any form of research involving the destruction of human embryos, as the destruction of human life is considered by the church to be gravely immoral. However, there is division in the Anglican Church, as Anglican authorities debate the status of the embryo. Some archbishops propose life begins 14 days after fertilisation, based on the premise that conception and fertilisation do not occur concurrently. Others maintain that an embryo at any stage of development is classified as a human being and is entitled to the same rights.

The Eastern Orthodox Church present as a united front that stem cell research involving totipotent cells is morally and ethically wrong in every instance, asserting there is no difference between an embryo inside or outside the womb, effectively equating the issue to abortion. They maintain that life begins at conception, and the willful taking of a human life in order to obtain the cells required for research is murder, ‘Under the microscope, the embryo is a clump of cells. Under the larger lens of moral clarity, the death of the embryo is the death of a human being’ (Rev. Johannes Jacobse).

While Religious institutions have been a significant opposition to controversial biotechnologies, there are also many objections on scientific grounds. Agricultural genetic modification is widespread in the global food industry, with crops being altered at a cellular level in order to produce more favourable characteristics. With modern science, crops can now be engineered to become resistant to droughts, floods and insects, grow larger and more consistent in size, and contain vitamins which are not naturally present, such as the addition of Beta Carotene in rice – which is known as Golden Rice – to ensure people without access to adequate nutrition consume a healthy dose of Vitamin A. The long term effects of the creation and consumption of genetically modified foods is relatively unknown, while there are undoubtably significant benefits, some studies have shown less favourable results, such as the development of lung disease in mice which have consumed genetically modified peas. Many scientists also see genetically modified foods as a threat to biodiversity.

These fears surrounding controversial biotechnologies and their potential for further development can be seen manifesting in science-fiction. While the technologies themselves may lean more towards fiction than science, the ethical concerns accurately reflect those present in society. A recent science-fiction television series which deals with these concerns is Orphan Black, a Canadian sci-fi thriller which raises issues about the ethical implications of human cloning and it’s effect on personal identity. While the full potential of human cloning is at this point more fiction than science, the possibilities are enough to generate viable concerns. In Orphan Black the clones are treated as objects,“this organism and the derivative genetic material is restricted intellectual property”, they don’t have ownership over their own bodies, which illustrates the concern regarding consent and human rights.

For my digital artefact, I’m leaning towards a blog, so I’m able to use various media while also including text. I intend to focus more on how the concerns surrounding the realities of biotechnology are manifesting in science-fiction rather than current opposition to established biotechnologies. I would like to interrogate how the ramifications of biotechnology are portrayed in multiple works of science fiction, and the ethics behind a science which essentially violates nature.

brittaspencer

In an era where the rate of technological advancement is increasing more dramatically than ever, the introduction and application of new technologies – more often than not – comes hand in hand with the question just because we can do something, does it mean that we should? Through my digital artefact I would like to explore the conversations that this question generates, investigating the ethical concerns surrounding emerging biotechnologies, and how these concerns are manifesting in science fiction. Biotechnology can be defined as ‘the manipulation of living organisms or their components’ (Merriam-Webster Dictionary), examples including stem cell research and agricultural genetic modification. Biotechnologies such as these have been met with resistance on various fronts, primarily due to their moral ambiguity and uncertainty regarding the potential wide-spread and long-term ramifications. Informed by the reality of progressive biotechnologies and bioethical debate, science-fiction reflects existing perspectives and possibilities, and acts as a…

View original post 737 more words